Oshinski & Forsberg, Ltd
Civil Law Attorney in Amesti, California

Civil Law Attorney in Amesti, California

What is Civil Litigation and an attorney servicing Amesti, California to assist you to?

 

Civil litigation is the procedure where civil matters are solved in a courtroom. Civil matters can be described as circumstances dealing with relationships between people, say for example a marriage, or a contract dispute between firms. Instead of a case being a person versus the government, as with a criminal matter, civil cases are an individual or business filing suit against somebody else or business.

 

Types of Civil Litigation

  • Civil Rights
  • Product Liability
  • Civil Remedies
  • Business Torts
  • Civil Procedure
  • Professional Malpractice

Responses to Frequently-Asked Inquiries (FAQs): Federal & State Civil Litigation

Q: When is it time to seek advice from an attorney about potential civil litigation?

When nervous that a company dispute may ultimately lead to formal legal action, it is important that you discuss your possible choices with federal litigation counsel. While a lawsuit is just one way to address a dispute, there can be other less-costly alternatives available also. The earlier you get litigation counsel engaged, the better the potential you will have to find an informal solution that protects your business without the time and money of litigation. While an expert litigator can assert your company’s rights in the court, he or she should also be able to assist you explore alternatives that do not involve setting course for trial.

Q: My business in Amesti has just been sued. What / things I need to understand about the civil litigation process?

If your business has just been sued, the very first thing you need to do is ensure you possess a clear understanding in the deadlines that apply within your case. You’ll need to respond for the plaintiff’s complaint inside the timeframe specified below the applicable court guidelines (state or federal); and, if you’re going to challenge specific troubles together with the complaint, you may need to have to meet a specific deadline with regard to these challenges too.

At this point, your firm also must initiate a “litigation hold.” This can be a systematic course of action of preserving hardcopy and electronic records that could potentially be discoverable in the litigation. Relevant personnel has to be advised accordingly, and it might also be essential to suspend present records-management protocols – including those that involve the deletion or overwriting of electronic files in the ordinary course of business enterprise.

As well as pre-trial motions, hearings, and settlement negotiations, complicated enterprise disputes also typically involve voluminous electronic discovery. Both parties (or all parties in multi-party litigation) are entitled to request production of documents that are relevant to the litigation, and meeting your production obligation is usually one of the most onerous elements of the litigation course of action. On the other hand, there are actually different grounds for challenging discovery requests in civil litigation, and your attorneys are going to be capable to advise you of both (i) methods for limiting your company’s discovery obligations, and (ii) approaches you can make use of the discovery process to get leverage within the litigation.

Q: We took action against a former employee who breached confidentiality, and now we are facing a lawsuit along with a public relations nightmare. What alternatives do we have available?

This can be a potentially difficult circumstance, and a single that needs a swift and strategic strategy. Though businesses want to take adequate steps to protect their proprietary data, in addition they have to have to be cognizant of your sensible implications of suing a disgruntled former employee in today’s globe of social media and explosive media coverage.

If a former employee has filed suit alleging discrimination, or if a former employee has initiated qui tam litigation against your corporation, they are matters that can be addressed through formal legal procedures. In case your company’s image is becoming battered within the public arena, we are able to hold the media accountable for false reporting and undertake other measures focused on crisis management.

Q: What will be the consequences if our litigation hold fails to preserve discoverable information?

The consequences of instituting a deficient litigation hold depend upon various aspects, like the scope in the deficiency plus the potential effects around the litigation. In cases of intentional failure or gross negligence, organizations can face important sanctions; such as a potential “negative inference” based upon the perceived want to help keep specific facts in the other party. Instituting and internally enforcing an acceptable litigation hold is actually a necessary a part of the litigation approach, and it’s one thing that all organizations have to do in great faith and with the guidance of experienced litigation counsel.

Q: Is it probable to pursue federal civil litigation against a organization that’s currently facing a federal investigation?

Yes. In actual fact, it really is widespread for organizations that violate federal privacy, securities, antitrust, and healthcare laws to face parallel civil litigation and government enforcement proceedings. If yet another company’s illegal conduct has harmed your company, we can enable you to seek legal treatments in court. Conversely, if you are facing a federal investigation and have also been served having a civil complaint, we can represent you in each proceedings. In the latter scenario, it may be of vital value to have counsel who can represent you in each matters, as choices you make in your civil case can potentially influence your government investigation (and vice versa).

A further popular situation exactly where private action can cause government enforcement is qui tam (or “whistleblower”) litigation. Inside a qui tam case, the government investigates allegations created by a private citizen (referred to as the “relator”); and in the event the government decides to pursue legal action, the relator is entitled to acquire a sizable portion of any restitution, fines, or other financial penalties the government collects. Qui tam actions are generally filed by disgruntled former personnel and competitors with ulterior motives, and with little (if any) substantive evidence. If your company is facing a qui tam lawsuit, we are able to take aggressive measures to intervene within the government’s investigation and seek to stop charges from being filed.

Q: When do I really need to take into consideration taking legal action to guard my company?

As we described earlier, should you are facing any prospective small business dispute with legal implications, seeking legal guidance promptly might be the top strategy to keep away from costly and contentious litigation down the line. Some examples of situations where it’ll typically be advisable to engage litigation counsel to conduct a case assessment incorporate:

  • Breaches of payment or performance obligations
  • Breaches of confidentiality
  • Breaches of non-competition and non-solicitation covenants
  • Breaches of warranties, representations, and indemnity obligations
  • Misappropriation of trade secrets
  • Intellectual property infringement
  • Fraud
  • Tortious interference
  • Disputes involving mergers and acquisitions
  • Shareholder and partner disputes

Civil Law Attorney in Amesti, California