(775) 301-4250 | (775) 301-4251 (Fax)
Oshinski & Forsberg, Ltd

What exactly is Civil Litigation and an attorney at law serving Loyalton, California to assist you to?

Civil Litigation Attorney in Loyalton, CaliforniaCivil litigation is the method where civil matters are resolved in a court of law. Civil matters can be defined as circumstances dealing with relationships between people, for instance a marriage, or a contract dispute between firms. Rather than a case being a person versus the government, like a criminal matter, civil cases are an individual or business filing suit against somebody else or business.

 

Types of Civil Litigation

  • Civil Rights
  • Product Liability
  • Civil Remedies
  • Business Torts
  • Civil Procedure
  • Professional Malpractice

Responses to Frequently-Asked Inquiries (FAQs): Federal & State Civil Litigation
Q: When is it time to visit an attorney at law about potential civil litigation?
Any time you are worried that a company dispute will lead to formal legal action, it is important that you talk about your own choices with federal litigation counsel. While legal action is certainly one way to deal with a dispute, there might be other less-costly available choices as well. The quicker you get litigation counsel engaged, the greater the opportunity you’ll have to find an informal solution that protects your business without the time and money of litigation. While a knowledgeable litigator will assert your company’s rights in the courtroom, he or she should also be able to assist you explore alternatives that actually do not involve setting course for trial.

Q: My business in Loyalton has just been sued. What I need to understand about the civil litigation process?
In case your organization has just been sued, the first thing you need to accomplish is make sure you possess a clear understanding of your deadlines that apply inside your case. You need to respond to the plaintiff’s complaint within the timeframe specified under the applicable court guidelines (state or federal); and, for anyone who is going to challenge particular challenges using the complaint, you may want to meet a precise deadline with regard to these challenges also.

At this point, your enterprise also needs to initiate a “litigation hold.” This is a systematic method of preserving hardcopy and electronic records that could potentially be discoverable within the litigation. Relevant personnel should be advised accordingly, and it may also be necessary to suspend current records-management protocols – such as these that involve the deletion or overwriting of electronic files within the ordinary course of organization.

Along with pre-trial motions, hearings, and settlement negotiations, complex business enterprise disputes also generally involve voluminous electronic discovery. Both parties (or all parties in multi-party litigation) are entitled to request production of documents which are relevant for the litigation, and meeting your production obligation is often one of the most onerous elements in the litigation course of action. On the other hand, there are different grounds for challenging discovery requests in civil litigation, and your attorneys will be capable to advise you of both (i) approaches for limiting your company’s discovery obligations, and (ii) strategies you may make use of the discovery method to get leverage in the litigation.

Q: We took action against a previous member of staff who breached confidentiality, and now we are facing a lawsuit and also a public relations nightmare. What possibilities do we have available?
That is a potentially difficult predicament, and a single that requires a swift and strategic method. While corporations need to have to take sufficient actions to defend their proprietary data, in addition they want to become cognizant from the sensible implications of suing a disgruntled former employee in today’s globe of social media and explosive media coverage.

If a former employee has filed suit alleging discrimination, or if a former employee has initiated qui tam litigation against your corporation, these are matters that may be addressed through formal legal procedures. In case your company’s image is being battered inside the public arena, we can hold the media accountable for false reporting and undertake other measures focused on crisis management.

Q: What would be the consequences if our litigation hold fails to preserve discoverable information?
The consequences of instituting a deficient litigation hold rely upon many different factors, including the scope in the deficiency as well as the potential effects around the litigation. In situations of intentional failure or gross negligence, providers can face considerable sanctions; like a prospective “negative inference” primarily based upon the perceived want to help keep certain facts from the other celebration. Instituting and internally enforcing an acceptable litigation hold is a needed a part of the litigation approach, and it truly is something that all corporations must do in fantastic faith and together with the guidance of skilled litigation counsel.

Q: Is it possible to pursue federal civil litigation against a enterprise that may be currently facing a federal investigation?
Yes. In truth, it is actually common for providers that violate federal privacy, securities, antitrust, and healthcare laws to face parallel civil litigation and government enforcement proceedings. If a different company’s illegal conduct has harmed your enterprise, we can make it easier to seek legal treatments in court. Conversely, for anyone who is facing a federal investigation and have also been served with a civil complaint, we are able to represent you in each proceedings. Within the latter scenario, it might be of important significance to possess counsel who can represent you in each matters, as choices you make within your civil case can potentially influence your government investigation (and vice versa).

One more typical situation where private action can result in government enforcement is qui tam (or “whistleblower”) litigation. Inside a qui tam case, the government investigates allegations made by a private citizen (known as the “relator”); and when the government decides to pursue legal action, the relator is entitled to receive a sizable portion of any restitution, fines, or other financial penalties the government collects. Qui tam actions are generally filed by disgruntled former employees and competitors with ulterior motives, and with little (if any) substantive evidence. In case your business is facing a qui tam lawsuit, we can take aggressive measures to intervene in the government’s investigation and seek to stop charges from getting filed.

Q: When do I have to contemplate taking legal action to safeguard my company?
As we described earlier, in case you are facing any potential small business dispute with legal implications, searching for legal suggestions promptly could be the best method to prevent pricey and contentious litigation down the line. Some examples of circumstances where it can frequently be advisable to engage litigation counsel to conduct a case assessment include:

  • Breaches of payment or performance obligations
  • Breaches of confidentiality
  • Breaches of non-competition and non-solicitation covenants
  • Breaches of warranties, representations, and indemnity obligations
  • Misappropriation of trade secrets
  • Intellectual property infringement
  • Fraud
  • Tortious interference
  • Disputes involving mergers and acquisitions
  • Shareholder and partner disputes

Civil Litigation Attorney in Loyalton, California

Last Updated on September 13, 2021

Stay Safe
 
Stay Open
 
Oshinski & Forsberg encourages all businesses to observe
the guidelines of our local health and government officials
so that we can all stay safe and stay open.
 
close-image