Oshinski & Forsberg, Ltd
Civil Litigation in Anderson Island, California

Civil Litigation in Anderson Island, California

What is Civil Litigation as well as an attorney at law serving Anderson Island, California that can assist you?


Civil litigation is the procedure where civil matters are resolved in a courtroom. Civil matters can be described as scenarios dealing with relationships between people, for example a marriage, or a contract dispute between firms. Instead of a case being a person versus the government, as with a criminal matter, civil cases are an individual or company filing suit against somebody else or business.


Types of Civil Litigation

  • Civil Rights
  • Product Liability
  • Civil Remedies
  • Business Torts
  • Civil Procedure
  • Professional Malpractice

Answers to Frequently-Asked Basic Questions (FAQs): Federal & State Civil Litigation

Q: When is it time for you to talk with an attorney at law about potential civil litigation?

When nervous that a business dispute will lead to formal legal action, it is important that you talk about the options with federal litigation counsel. While a lawsuit can be a way to approach a dispute, there may be other less-costly available options as well. The earlier you get litigation counsel included, the higher the opportunity you will have to find an informal solution that protects your company without the time and money of litigation. While a knowledgeable litigator can assert your company’s rights in court, he or she should also be able to assist you to explore alternatives that do not involve setting course for trial.

Q: My business in Anderson Island has just been sued. Just what do I need to find out about the civil litigation process?

In case your organization has just been sued, the very first thing you’ll need to do is ensure you possess a clear understanding in the deadlines that apply in your case. You need to respond to the plaintiff’s complaint within the timeframe specified below the applicable court rules (state or federal); and, if you are going to challenge certain troubles using the complaint, you could possibly need to meet a certain deadline with regard to these challenges too.

At this point, your company also must initiate a “litigation hold.” This can be a systematic method of preserving hardcopy and electronic records that may potentially be discoverable in the litigation. Relevant personnel must be advised accordingly, and it may also be essential to suspend existing records-management protocols – such as these that involve the deletion or overwriting of electronic files inside the ordinary course of enterprise.

In conjunction with pre-trial motions, hearings, and settlement negotiations, complicated business enterprise disputes also frequently involve voluminous electronic discovery. Each parties (or all parties in multi-party litigation) are entitled to request production of documents that happen to be relevant towards the litigation, and meeting your production obligation is often probably the most onerous aspects in the litigation method. Nonetheless, there are actually various grounds for difficult discovery requests in civil litigation, as well as your attorneys are going to be in a position to advise you of both (i) tactics for limiting your company’s discovery obligations, and (ii) methods you can use the discovery course of action to achieve leverage inside the litigation.

Q: We took action against a former worker who violated privacy, and now we’re facing a lawsuit in addition to a public relations nightmare. What alternatives do we have available?

This is a potentially challenging situation, and one that needs a swift and strategic method. Although corporations want to take sufficient methods to safeguard their proprietary facts, they also need to have to be cognizant of your practical implications of suing a disgruntled former employee in today’s globe of social media and explosive media coverage.

If a former employee has filed suit alleging discrimination, or if a former employee has initiated qui tam litigation against your organization, these are matters that could be addressed via formal legal procedures. If your company’s image is getting battered in the public arena, we are able to hold the media accountable for false reporting and undertake other measures focused on crisis management.

Q: What are the consequences if our litigation hold fails to preserve discoverable information?

The consequences of instituting a deficient litigation hold depend upon a variety of things, including the scope of the deficiency as well as the prospective effects around the litigation. In cases of intentional failure or gross negligence, providers can face significant sanctions; which includes a prospective “negative inference” based upon the perceived wish to maintain specific information and facts in the other party. Instituting and internally enforcing an appropriate litigation hold is usually a required a part of the litigation method, and it can be some thing that all companies have to do in fantastic faith and with all the guidance of seasoned litigation counsel.

Q: Is it achievable to pursue federal civil litigation against a firm which is currently facing a federal investigation?

Yes. In reality, it truly is typical for firms that violate federal privacy, securities, antitrust, and healthcare laws to face parallel civil litigation and government enforcement proceedings. If another company’s illegal conduct has harmed your enterprise, we can enable you to seek legal treatments in court. Conversely, if you are facing a federal investigation and have also been served with a civil complaint, we are able to represent you in both proceedings. Within the latter scenario, it might be of essential importance to have counsel who can represent you in both matters, as choices you make within your civil case can potentially impact your government investigation (and vice versa).

One more common scenario where private action can bring about government enforcement is qui tam (or “whistleblower”) litigation. Inside a qui tam case, the government investigates allegations made by a private citizen (known as the “relator”); and if the government decides to pursue legal action, the relator is entitled to get a sizable portion of any restitution, fines, or other economic penalties the government collects. Qui tam actions are frequently filed by disgruntled former personnel and competitors with ulterior motives, and with small (if any) substantive evidence. In case your business is facing a qui tam lawsuit, we are able to take aggressive measures to intervene within the government’s investigation and seek to prevent charges from getting filed.

Q: When do I should look at taking legal action to guard my company?

As we mentioned earlier, should you are facing any prospective enterprise dispute with legal implications, seeking legal suggestions promptly could be the top strategy to steer clear of expensive and contentious litigation down the line. Some examples of scenarios where it will typically be advisable to engage litigation counsel to conduct a case assessment consist of:

  • Breaches of payment or performance obligations
  • Breaches of confidentiality
  • Breaches of non-competition and non-solicitation covenants
  • Breaches of warranties, representations, and indemnity obligations
  • Misappropriation of trade secrets
  • Intellectual property infringement
  • Fraud
  • Tortious interference
  • Disputes involving mergers and acquisitions
  • Shareholder and partner disputes

Civil Litigation in Anderson Island, California

Stay Safe
Stay Open
Oshinski & Forsberg encourages all businesses to observe
the guidelines of our local health and government officials
so that we can all stay safe and stay open.