(775) 301-4250 | (775) 301-4251 (Fax)
Oshinski & Forsberg, Ltd

So what’s Civil Litigation as well as an attorney servicing Roads End, California to help you?

Civil Litigation in Roads End, CaliforniaCivil litigation is the process wherein civil matters are solved in a court of law. Civil matters can be described as situations dealing with relationships between people, for example a marriage, or a contract dispute between businesses. Rather than a case being a person versus the government, as with a criminal matter, civil cases are any person or business filing suit against another individual or business.


Types of Civil Litigation

  • Civil Rights
  • Product Liability
  • Civil Remedies
  • Business Torts
  • Civil Procedure
  • Professional Malpractice

Answers to Frequently-Asked Inquiries (FAQs): Federal & State Civil Litigation
Q: When is it time for you to speak with an attorney at law about potential civil litigation?
When anxious that a business dispute might lead to formal legal action, it is critical that you talk about your own options with federal litigation counsel. While legal action can be a way to approach a dispute, there are other less-costly options available also. The earlier you get litigation counsel included, the higher the possibility you’ll need to find an informal solution that protects your company without the time and expense of litigation. While a skilled litigator can assert your company’s rights in the courtroom, he or she should also be able to assist you explore alternatives that do not involve setting course for trial.

Q: My business in Roads End has just been sued. Just what do I need to find out about the civil litigation process?
If your organization has just been sued, the very first thing you may need to do is be sure you possess a clear understanding in the deadlines that apply in your case. You may need to respond towards the plaintiff’s complaint within the timeframe specified under the applicable court guidelines (state or federal); and, if you are going to challenge certain difficulties with the complaint, you might will need to meet a certain deadline with regard to these challenges at the same time.

At this point, your business also needs to initiate a “litigation hold.” This can be a systematic method of preserving hardcopy and electronic records that may possibly potentially be discoverable in the litigation. Relevant personnel has to be advised accordingly, and it may also be essential to suspend existing records-management protocols – such as those that involve the deletion or overwriting of electronic files in the ordinary course of enterprise.

As well as pre-trial motions, hearings, and settlement negotiations, complex business enterprise disputes also generally involve voluminous electronic discovery. Each parties (or all parties in multi-party litigation) are entitled to request production of documents which are relevant to the litigation, and meeting your production obligation can be one of the most onerous aspects in the litigation method. However, there are various grounds for challenging discovery requests in civil litigation, and your attorneys will likely be able to advise you of each (i) approaches for limiting your company’s discovery obligations, and (ii) ways you are able to make use of the discovery course of action to acquire leverage inside the litigation.

Q: We took action against a previous employee who violated confidentiality, and now we’re facing a lawsuit along with a public relations nightmare. What solutions do we’ve got available?
This is a potentially difficult scenario, and a single that requires a swift and strategic strategy. When businesses need to take adequate steps to safeguard their proprietary data, additionally they have to have to be cognizant from the practical implications of suing a disgruntled former employee in today’s globe of social media and explosive media coverage.

If a former employee has filed suit alleging discrimination, or if a former employee has initiated qui tam litigation against your enterprise, these are matters that can be addressed through formal legal procedures. If your company’s image is becoming battered in the public arena, we are able to hold the media accountable for false reporting and undertake other measures focused on crisis management.

Q: What would be the consequences if our litigation hold fails to preserve discoverable information?
The consequences of instituting a deficient litigation hold depend upon many different elements, such as the scope of your deficiency plus the prospective effects on the litigation. In instances of intentional failure or gross negligence, providers can face considerable sanctions; like a potential “negative inference” based upon the perceived desire to keep specific details in the other party. Instituting and internally enforcing an suitable litigation hold can be a vital a part of the litigation course of action, and it truly is anything that all providers have to do in very good faith and with all the guidance of experienced litigation counsel.

Q: Is it feasible to pursue federal civil litigation against a business that is already facing a federal investigation?
Yes. In fact, it truly is prevalent for organizations that violate federal privacy, securities, antitrust, and healthcare laws to face parallel civil litigation and government enforcement proceedings. If a further company’s illegal conduct has harmed your business, we can assist you to seek legal remedies in court. Conversely, should you be facing a federal investigation and have also been served with a civil complaint, we can represent you in both proceedings. Inside the latter situation, it might be of important value to possess counsel who can represent you in both matters, as choices you make inside your civil case can potentially impact your government investigation (and vice versa).

Another frequent scenario where private action can result in government enforcement is qui tam (or “whistleblower”) litigation. Within a qui tam case, the government investigates allegations produced by a private citizen (referred to as the “relator”); and if the government decides to pursue legal action, the relator is entitled to acquire a sizable portion of any restitution, fines, or other monetary penalties the government collects. Qui tam actions are frequently filed by disgruntled former staff and competitors with ulterior motives, and with little (if any) substantive evidence. In case your corporation is facing a qui tam lawsuit, we can take aggressive measures to intervene inside the government’s investigation and seek to prevent charges from becoming filed.

Q: When do I need to look at taking legal action to guard my company?
As we mentioned earlier, if you are facing any prospective business dispute with legal implications, seeking legal tips promptly is often the best strategy to stay clear of expensive and contentious litigation down the line. Some examples of conditions exactly where it can frequently be advisable to engage litigation counsel to conduct a case assessment incorporate:

  • Breaches of payment or performance obligations
  • Breaches of confidentiality
  • Breaches of non-competition and non-solicitation covenants
  • Breaches of warranties, representations, and indemnity obligations
  • Misappropriation of trade secrets
  • Intellectual property infringement
  • Fraud
  • Tortious interference
  • Disputes involving mergers and acquisitions
  • Shareholder and partner disputes

Civil Litigation in Roads End, California

Last Updated on February 12, 2022