(775) 301-4250 | (775) 301-4251 (Fax)
Oshinski & Forsberg, Ltd

Exactly what is Civil Litigation as well as an attorney servicing Glenbrook, Nevada to help you out?

Civil Litigation Lawyer in Glenbrook, NevadaCivil litigation is the procedure in which civil matters are resolved in a court of law. Civil matters can be defined as circumstances dealing with relationships between people, perhaps a marriage, or a contract dispute between corporations. Instead of a case being a person versus the government, such as a criminal matter, civil cases are a person or company filing suit against another individual or business.

 

Types of Civil Litigation

  • Civil Rights
  • Product Liability
  • Civil Remedies
  • Business Torts
  • Civil Procedure
  • Professional Malpractice

Answers to Frequently-Asked Inquiries (FAQs): Federal & State Civil Litigation
Q: When is it time for you to seek advice from an attorney about potential civil litigation?
Any time you are troubled that a business dispute will swiftly lead to formal legal action, it is crucial that you discuss your own possible choices with federal litigation counsel. While a lawsuit is just one way to deal with a dispute, there is certainly other less-costly options available too. The sooner you get litigation counsel included, the higher the probability you will need to find an informal solution that protects your business without the time and money of litigation. While a professional litigator will assert your company’s rights in the courtroom, he or she should also be able to assist you to explore alternatives that do not involve setting course for trial.

Q: My business in Glenbrook, Nevada has just been sued. Things I need to find out about the civil litigation process?
If your small business has just been sued, the very first thing you’ll need to complete is be sure you have a clear understanding of your deadlines that apply within your case. You need to respond towards the plaintiff’s complaint inside the timeframe specified under the applicable court rules (state or federal); and, should you be going to challenge certain troubles together with the complaint, you could want to meet a specific deadline with regard to these challenges as well.

At this point, your business also must initiate a “litigation hold.” This can be a systematic method of preserving hardcopy and electronic records that could potentially be discoverable in the litigation. Relevant personnel should be advised accordingly, and it may also be necessary to suspend present records-management protocols – including these that involve the deletion or overwriting of electronic files inside the ordinary course of organization.

In conjunction with pre-trial motions, hearings, and settlement negotiations, complex small business disputes also often involve voluminous electronic discovery. Both parties (or all parties in multi-party litigation) are entitled to request production of documents which can be relevant towards the litigation, and meeting your production obligation might be just about the most onerous aspects on the litigation approach. On the other hand, you will discover a variety of grounds for difficult discovery requests in civil litigation, as well as your attorneys will be in a position to advise you of both (i) techniques for limiting your company’s discovery obligations, and (ii) techniques you could use the discovery process to acquire leverage within the litigation.

Q: We took action against a previous worker who breached privacy, and now we’re facing a lawsuit and a public relations nightmare. What options do we have available?
This really is a potentially difficult scenario, and a single that needs a swift and strategic strategy. Although providers need to have to take adequate actions to guard their proprietary information, they also require to be cognizant from the sensible implications of suing a disgruntled former employee in today’s world of social media and explosive media coverage.

If a former employee has filed suit alleging discrimination, or if a former employee has initiated qui tam litigation against your firm, they are matters which can be addressed via formal legal procedures. If your company’s image is becoming battered in the public arena, we can hold the media accountable for false reporting and undertake other measures focused on crisis management.

Q: What would be the consequences if our litigation hold fails to preserve discoverable information?
The consequences of instituting a deficient litigation hold rely upon a variety of variables, which includes the scope from the deficiency along with the prospective effects around the litigation. In instances of intentional failure or gross negligence, corporations can face substantial sanctions; like a prospective “negative inference” primarily based upon the perceived want to help keep particular information from the other party. Instituting and internally enforcing an suitable litigation hold is really a important a part of the litigation course of action, and it can be a thing that all companies need to do in very good faith and with the guidance of skilled litigation counsel.

Q: Is it feasible to pursue federal civil litigation against a organization that is certainly already facing a federal investigation?
Yes. Actually, it is actually prevalent for companies that violate federal privacy, securities, antitrust, and healthcare laws to face parallel civil litigation and government enforcement proceedings. If a further company’s illegal conduct has harmed your company, we are able to help you seek legal treatments in court. Conversely, when you are facing a federal investigation and have also been served with a civil complaint, we are able to represent you in both proceedings. Within the latter situation, it may be of important importance to possess counsel who can represent you in each matters, as choices you make inside your civil case can potentially impact your government investigation (and vice versa).

Yet another frequent situation where private action can bring about government enforcement is qui tam (or “whistleblower”) litigation. Within a qui tam case, the government investigates allegations made by a private citizen (referred to as the “relator”); and when the government decides to pursue legal action, the relator is entitled to receive a sizable portion of any restitution, fines, or other economic penalties the government collects. Qui tam actions are usually filed by disgruntled former personnel and competitors with ulterior motives, and with little (if any) substantive proof. In case your firm is facing a qui tam lawsuit, we can take aggressive measures to intervene in the government’s investigation and seek to stop charges from getting filed.

Q: When do I must take into account taking legal action to safeguard my company?
As we pointed out earlier, if you are facing any possible business enterprise dispute with legal implications, searching for legal tips promptly may be the most beneficial strategy to stay clear of pricey and contentious litigation down the line. Some examples of scenarios where it will commonly be advisable to engage litigation counsel to conduct a case assessment incorporate:

  • Breaches of payment or performance obligations
  • Breaches of confidentiality
  • Breaches of non-competition and non-solicitation covenants
  • Breaches of warranties, representations, and indemnity obligations
  • Misappropriation of trade secrets
  • Intellectual property infringement
  • Fraud
  • Tortious interference
  • Disputes involving mergers and acquisitions
  • Shareholder and partner disputes

Civil Litigation Lawyer in Glenbrook, Nevada

Last Updated on October 6, 2021

Stay Safe
 
Stay Open
 
Oshinski & Forsberg encourages all businesses to observe
the guidelines of our local health and government officials
so that we can all stay safe and stay open.
 
close-image