(775) 301-4250 | (775) 301-4251 (Fax)
Oshinski & Forsberg, Ltd

Just what is Civil Litigation and an attorney serving Mineral City, Nevada that can assist you?

Litigation in Mineral City, NevadaCivil litigation is the procedure through which civil matters are resolved in a court of law. Civil matters can be defined as scenarios dealing with relationships between people, for instance a marriage, or a contract dispute between companies. Instead of a case being a person versus the government, as with a criminal matter, civil cases are a person or company filing suit against somebody else or business.


Types of Civil Litigation

  • Civil Rights
  • Product Liability
  • Civil Remedies
  • Business Torts
  • Civil Procedure
  • Professional Malpractice

Answers to Frequently-Asked Inquiries (FAQs): Federal & State Civil Litigation
Q: When is it time to refer to an attorney about potential civil litigation?
Any time you are nervous that a company dispute may ultimately lead to formal legal action, it is vital that you discuss your options with federal litigation counsel. While legal action can be a way to approach a dispute, there are other less-costly available choices as well. The earlier you get litigation counsel engaged, the greater the possibility you’ll need to find an informal solution that protects your company without the time and money of litigation. While a professional litigator will assert your company’s rights in the court, he or she should also be able to help you explore alternatives that actually do not involve setting course for trial.

Q: My business in Mineral City, Nevada has just been sued. What I need to learn about the civil litigation process?
If your organization has just been sued, the first thing you’ll need to accomplish is be sure to possess a clear understanding from the deadlines that apply within your case. You may need to respond to the plaintiff’s complaint within the timeframe specified below the applicable court guidelines (state or federal); and, when you are going to challenge particular issues with all the complaint, you could want to meet a specific deadline with regard to these challenges too.

At this point, your firm also needs to initiate a “litigation hold.” This is a systematic method of preserving hardcopy and electronic records that may potentially be discoverable within the litigation. Relevant personnel have to be advised accordingly, and it may also be essential to suspend existing records-management protocols – like these that involve the deletion or overwriting of electronic files within the ordinary course of company.

Together with pre-trial motions, hearings, and settlement negotiations, complicated small business disputes also typically involve voluminous electronic discovery. Each parties (or all parties in multi-party litigation) are entitled to request production of documents that are relevant for the litigation, and meeting your production obligation is usually just about the most onerous elements of your litigation approach. On the other hand, there are actually different grounds for challenging discovery requests in civil litigation, and your attorneys will likely be able to advise you of each (i) tactics for limiting your company’s discovery obligations, and (ii) strategies you can make use of the discovery procedure to acquire leverage inside the litigation.

Q: We took action against a former member of staff who breached privacy, and now we are facing a lawsuit as well as a public relations nightmare. What alternatives do we’ve got available?
This is a potentially difficult circumstance, and one that requires a swift and strategic approach. Whilst businesses need to have to take adequate actions to safeguard their proprietary information, they also need to have to be cognizant from the practical implications of suing a disgruntled former employee in today’s world of social media and explosive media coverage.

If a former employee has filed suit alleging discrimination, or if a former employee has initiated qui tam litigation against your enterprise, they are matters which will be addressed by means of formal legal procedures. In case your company’s image is being battered within the public arena, we can hold the media accountable for false reporting and undertake other measures focused on crisis management.

Q: What will be the consequences if our litigation hold fails to preserve discoverable information?
The consequences of instituting a deficient litigation hold rely upon many different aspects, including the scope of the deficiency plus the potential effects around the litigation. In circumstances of intentional failure or gross negligence, providers can face important sanctions; including a prospective “negative inference” based upon the perceived desire to keep specific data from the other party. Instituting and internally enforcing an appropriate litigation hold is really a vital a part of the litigation approach, and it can be a thing that all organizations ought to do in good faith and with the guidance of seasoned litigation counsel.

Q: Is it achievable to pursue federal civil litigation against a company that is currently facing a federal investigation?
Yes. Actually, it is actually common for organizations that violate federal privacy, securities, antitrust, and healthcare laws to face parallel civil litigation and government enforcement proceedings. If one more company’s illegal conduct has harmed your business, we can assist you seek legal treatments in court. Conversely, if you’re facing a federal investigation and have also been served having a civil complaint, we can represent you in both proceedings. In the latter scenario, it might be of critical value to have counsel who can represent you in each matters, as choices you make in your civil case can potentially effect your government investigation (and vice versa).

A further popular situation exactly where private action can cause government enforcement is qui tam (or “whistleblower”) litigation. Within a qui tam case, the government investigates allegations made by a private citizen (known as the “relator”); and when the government decides to pursue legal action, the relator is entitled to receive a sizable portion of any restitution, fines, or other financial penalties the government collects. Qui tam actions are usually filed by disgruntled former workers and competitors with ulterior motives, and with tiny (if any) substantive proof. If your corporation is facing a qui tam lawsuit, we can take aggressive measures to intervene within the government’s investigation and seek to prevent charges from being filed.

Q: When do I really need to take into account taking legal action to shield my company?
As we pointed out earlier, in the event you are facing any possible business enterprise dispute with legal implications, seeking legal tips promptly is often the most beneficial technique to stay clear of costly and contentious litigation down the line. Some examples of circumstances exactly where it’ll commonly be advisable to engage litigation counsel to conduct a case assessment involve:

  • Breaches of payment or performance obligations
  • Breaches of confidentiality
  • Breaches of non-competition and non-solicitation covenants
  • Breaches of warranties, representations, and indemnity obligations
  • Misappropriation of trade secrets
  • Intellectual property infringement
  • Fraud
  • Tortious interference
  • Disputes involving mergers and acquisitions
  • Shareholder and partner disputes

Litigation in Mineral City, Nevada

Last Updated on February 12, 2022