(775) 301-4250 | (775) 301-4251 (Fax)
Oshinski & Forsberg, Ltd

So what’s Civil Litigation as well as an attorney at law serving Kinkaid, Nevada to help you out?

Litigator in Kinkaid, NevadaCivil litigation is the procedure in which civil matters are settled in a courtroom. Civil matters can be described as scenarios dealing with relationships between people, for example a marriage, or a contract dispute between businesses. Rather than a case being a person versus the government, as in a criminal matter, civil cases are any person or business filing suit against another individual or business.


Types of Civil Litigation

  • Civil Rights
  • Product Liability
  • Civil Remedies
  • Business Torts
  • Civil Procedure
  • Professional Malpractice

Answers to Frequently-Asked Important questions (FAQs): Federal & State Civil Litigation
Q: When is it time for you to speak to an attorney at law about potential civil litigation?
When troubled that a company dispute will swiftly lead to formal legal action, it is critical that you talk about the choices with federal litigation counsel. While legal action is certainly one way to deal with a dispute, there might be other less-costly available options as well. The sooner you get litigation counsel engaged, the better the potential you’ll have to find an informal solution that protects your business without the time and expense of litigation. While a knowledgeable litigator will assert your company’s rights in court, he or she should also be able to help you explore alternatives that do not involve setting course for trial.

Q: My business in Kinkaid, Nevada has just been sued. Things I need to learn about the civil litigation process?
In case your enterprise has just been sued, the first thing you need to perform is ensure you possess a clear understanding with the deadlines that apply within your case. You’ll need to respond towards the plaintiff’s complaint inside the timeframe specified beneath the applicable court rules (state or federal); and, if you are going to challenge specific problems with the complaint, you could want to meet a specific deadline with regard to these challenges too.

At this point, your firm also needs to initiate a “litigation hold.” This is a systematic approach of preserving hardcopy and electronic records that may possibly potentially be discoverable in the litigation. Relevant personnel must be advised accordingly, and it might also be necessary to suspend existing records-management protocols – such as those that involve the deletion or overwriting of electronic files inside the ordinary course of business.

In conjunction with pre-trial motions, hearings, and settlement negotiations, complicated organization disputes also usually involve voluminous electronic discovery. Each parties (or all parties in multi-party litigation) are entitled to request production of documents which are relevant to the litigation, and meeting your production obligation is often just about the most onerous elements of the litigation approach. On the other hand, you will discover numerous grounds for difficult discovery requests in civil litigation, as well as your attorneys will be capable to advise you of both (i) approaches for limiting your company’s discovery obligations, and (ii) approaches it is possible to make use of the discovery procedure to obtain leverage in the litigation.

Q: We took action against a former worker who breached privacy, and now we are facing a lawsuit as well as a public relations nightmare. What selections do we have available?
This really is a potentially challenging scenario, and 1 that needs a swift and strategic strategy. Though businesses need to have to take adequate measures to defend their proprietary facts, in addition they need to have to become cognizant of the practical implications of suing a disgruntled former employee in today’s globe of social media and explosive media coverage.

If a former employee has filed suit alleging discrimination, or if a former employee has initiated qui tam litigation against your company, they are matters which can be addressed through formal legal procedures. If your company’s image is getting battered inside the public arena, we can hold the media accountable for false reporting and undertake other measures focused on crisis management.

Q: What will be the consequences if our litigation hold fails to preserve discoverable information?
The consequences of instituting a deficient litigation hold depend upon a range of things, like the scope on the deficiency and the prospective effects around the litigation. In cases of intentional failure or gross negligence, organizations can face significant sanctions; including a prospective “negative inference” based upon the perceived wish to keep specific facts in the other party. Instituting and internally enforcing an acceptable litigation hold is actually a required part of the litigation approach, and it truly is anything that all organizations really need to do in excellent faith and using the guidance of knowledgeable litigation counsel.

Q: Is it achievable to pursue federal civil litigation against a firm that is certainly currently facing a federal investigation?
Yes. Actually, it is actually typical for firms that violate federal privacy, securities, antitrust, and healthcare laws to face parallel civil litigation and government enforcement proceedings. If one more company’s illegal conduct has harmed your enterprise, we are able to make it easier to seek legal remedies in court. Conversely, when you are facing a federal investigation and have also been served with a civil complaint, we can represent you in each proceedings. In the latter scenario, it might be of critical significance to possess counsel who can represent you in each matters, as decisions you make within your civil case can potentially influence your government investigation (and vice versa).

A further popular scenario where private action can result in government enforcement is qui tam (or “whistleblower”) litigation. Within a qui tam case, the government investigates allegations made by a private citizen (known as the “relator”); and if the government decides to pursue legal action, the relator is entitled to receive a sizable portion of any restitution, fines, or other economic penalties the government collects. Qui tam actions are frequently filed by disgruntled former workers and competitors with ulterior motives, and with little (if any) substantive evidence. If your corporation is facing a qui tam lawsuit, we are able to take aggressive measures to intervene inside the government’s investigation and seek to prevent charges from being filed.

Q: When do I really need to take into account taking legal action to shield my company?
As we described earlier, in the event you are facing any prospective business enterprise dispute with legal implications, searching for legal advice promptly can be the very best way to avoid expensive and contentious litigation down the line. Some examples of circumstances where it’ll generally be advisable to engage litigation counsel to conduct a case assessment contain:

  • Breaches of payment or performance obligations
  • Breaches of confidentiality
  • Breaches of non-competition and non-solicitation covenants
  • Breaches of warranties, representations, and indemnity obligations
  • Misappropriation of trade secrets
  • Intellectual property infringement
  • Fraud
  • Tortious interference
  • Disputes involving mergers and acquisitions
  • Shareholder and partner disputes

Litigator in Kinkaid, Nevada

Last Updated on February 12, 2022